What We've Been Reading - Week of Sept. 11
Markets & Economy:
What We've Been Reading - Week of August 21
Markets & Economy:
If you want to see one of the best rollouts of a fairly complex business book, witness Michael Lewis’ extensive PR campaign for Flash Boys. He started with a “60 Minutes” exclusive where he said the “U.S. stock market is rigged”—not exactly earth shattering, but it got a debate going on Twitter among Wall St. columnists and other pundits. (Here’s a good one) The splashy “60 Minutes” debut then basically steamrolled into an all-day debate and coverage of high frequency trading on all of the business networks and the main networks (including CBS, of course).
The New York Times had no less than four pieces from the book including an excerpt in the New York Times Magazine, a DealBook column by Andrew Ross Sorkin, an official review of the bookand a piece about all the hoopla. The Wall Street Journal had its own review and so did other major outlets. A search in Factiva yielded 385 mentions for the book in the last 24 hours, and that doesn’t include blogs.
Then, a BNP Paribas executive wrote to all of his clients and told them Lewis was invested in IEX, the platform to combat high frequency traders that he wrote about. That prompted Lewis to issue a strong rebuttal on his Facebook page calling out the BNP executive by name. Twitter went nuts in the afternoon just as the whole Lewis frenzy was beginning to die down. BuzzFeed obtained a copy of the email (the post got 58,000 views in less than 24 hours), which fueled the fire even more.
To top it all off, in a highly unusual move, the FBI reached out to media outlets to let them know they had been running an investigation of high frequency trading for over a year.
AND THAT’S JUST THE FIRST DAY!
The book is of course No. 1 on the Amazon Best Sellers list right now.
By Zach Kouwe
Zach Kouwe is a Vice President at Dukas Public Relations.
By Zach Kouwe
Ray Dalio on YouTube – A Great PR MoveRay Dalio, founder of the largest hedge fund in the world, the $150 billion Bridgewater Associates, has decided it’s time to really come out of the shadows and begin sharing his pearls of economic wisdom. Mr. Dalio, who has been called a “hedge fund cult leader” and “the world’s richest and strangest hedge fund,” has slowly been engaging with the media over the last few years, most likely to combat and explain his unusual management style. But he never looked that comfortable providing a 30-second answer to a TV reporter’s questions about his outlook for the markets.
Now, instead of dealing directly with the media to demystify his theories on the economy, he’s taken his message directly to the people through YouTube. (As of this writing his video already had over 350,000 views.)
Mr. Dalio explained his move to YouTube to the New York Times:
“While I kept it confidential until recently, I now want to share it because I believe that it could be very helpful in reducing big economic blunders, if it was more broadly understood,” he wrote in an e-mail. He explained that, “I believe that most influential decision makers and most people cause a lot of needless economic suffering because they are missing the fundamentals.”
There’s no doubt Mr. Dalio wants to influence policymakers, regulators and academics. But another benefit of sharing his message on YouTube is that it humanizes him a bit and shows the world he’s a serious and transparent thinker – not just the billionaire leader of some hedge fund cult.
This is great PR for Bridgewater – it will help the firm recruit the best and the brightest thinkers from around the world and will likely attract investors as people from Asia to Africa learn about Mr. Dalio’s successful strategies and theories on the economy. (We wouldn’t be surprised if Bridgewater decides to open its strategies to retail investors at some point.)
Just a few years ago, you would never think one of the world’s best hedge fund managers would be appearing on YouTube. Most managers over 50 think YouTube is a service for funny videos or music. They’ve never thought about it as a way to actually reach the public, express their views and build their brands. But reaching out directly to the public and bypassing the media filter, even if the media does pick up on it later, is sometimes the most effective way to get your message out. Big and small asset managers should pay attention.
By Zach Kouwe
This week the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an update to their socialmedia guidelines regarding filing requirements under the Investment Company Act and other statutes. Overall, it appears the Commission wants to foster a more lenient regulatory environment on Twitter and other social platforms so investment companies aren’t stifled from using this new form of marketing and communication.
The update makes clear that the sharing relevant links, stories, white papers and other non-fund-related things over Twitter and other platforms are exempt from filing requirements. Here’s an example of a Tweet that is acceptable:
“Consumer Reports has written an article in which it mentions our ‘Brand X’ Rewards Card. Are you a member?”
“The ‘Low Volatility Anomaly’ is explained in our latest white paper LINK”
Even mentioning the word “performance” or sharing a link back to a website that includes fund performance data is exempt from filing requirements. Stating specific performance data in the communication still needs to be filed. (ie. Fund X achieved a 3 month return of XX%) These new guidelines should allow asset management firms and other investment companies more leeway to communicate and influence via social media.
Many large alternative and traditional asset managers such as The Carlyle Group,Blackstone Group, Pimco, Blackrock and State Street are already using Twitter as a public relations tool to build their brands and communicate their thought leadership. (Pimco already has over 100,000 followers) While these large firms have the resources and extensive compliance departments to ensure adherence to the rules, these new guidelines make basic sharing of information on social media a much less burdensome activity. Every asset manager that aims to be an influencer in the community should be participating.
By Zach Kouwe
I recently stumbled upon a new survey of what institutional investors look for in their hedge fund managers. The survey, from fund administrator SEI, was particularly interesting because it covered what investors think about a particular firm’s “brand” identity and how that factors into their decision to invest in the fund.
Not surprisingly, the results were mixed with many investors seemingly confused by the question. But from investors and consultants we've spoken to, having a solid and understandable brand in the market matters whether they admit it or not. From the survey:
When we asked institutional investors to define “brand,” their answers diverged. Respondents were similarly torn on the importance of brand; one-third said it makes no difference in their selection of hedge funds, one-third disagree, and one-third are neutral.
A hedge fund needs to able to describe its unique investment process in an understandable and concise way both to potential investors and the public at large. Take it from Bruce Frumerman, CEO of investment management industry communications and sales marketing consultancy, Frumerman & Nemeth Inc. from the survey:
“You know your firm has graduated from commodity to brand when, after stating your fund’s name and strategy category, a prospect can add two or three sentences of elaboration about how you invest," he says. “If a hedge fund doesn’t actively market its investment- process story, it won’t outgrow being perceived as a replaceable commodity, known only by the pigeon-hole category of its strategy and its most recent returns."
This can apply not just for hedge funds, but for any type of investment product or service. Money managers across the board, whether they manage institutional or retail capital, are becoming much more scrutinized. If they can't define their clear narrative, they won't be able to distinguish themselves. Hedge fund managers in particular can’t just sit back and rely on their track record – indeed the survey points out that investment performance is not even the most important factor when investors choose a fund. (This is already starting in the hedge fund world)
“There are those who get it right, and gather billions in assets, and those with no idea of how to get their message across. They just use the same mumbled jargon and rarely convey what is actually happening. Marketers who think they don’t need to put it down on paper and convince others their process makes sense will get nowhere,” declared a managing director at a large European institutional investor. Our panelists also emphasized how important it is to spend the time and resources needed to make complex processes clear and simple. “Explaining simply just what it is you do is the single greatest feat for hedge funds,” said Michael Green, CEO, International with American Century Investments.
By Zach Kouwe
Click to set custom HTML